British musicians protest government’s AI plans with an ‘almost’ silent album
More than 1,000 musicians released a silent album to protest plans to let artificial intelligence use artists’ copyrighted creative work
British musician Kate Bush is one of over a thousand artists on a new album that is “almost silent”, protesting government plans to let AI use their creative work. Photo: ShutterstockA new album, Is This What We Want?, features a stellar list of more than 1,000 musicians – and the sound of silence.
With contributions from British artists including Kate Bush, Annie Lennox, Cat Stevens and Damon Albarn, the album was released Tuesday to protest proposed British changes to artificial intelligence (AI) laws that artists fear will erode their creative control.
The United Kingdom government is discussing letting tech firms use copyrighted material to help train AI models unless the creators explicitly opt-out.
Critics of the idea fear it will make it harder for artists to retain control of their work and undermine Britain’s creative industries. Elton John and Paul McCartney are among those who have spoken out against the plan.
Hollywood actors secure safeguards around AI use as strike comes to an end
The protest album features “almost silence”, said composer and AI developer Ed Newton-Rex, who organised the album.
The 12 tracks consist of recordings of empty studios and performance spaces “to symbolise what we expect will happen if the government’s proposals go through”.
“It’s a mix of artists that everyone’s heard of and many musicians who are not household names,” he told Associated Press. “And I think that’s really important because this issue is going to affect all of us.”
The titles of the 12 tracks spell out: “The British government must not legalise music theft to benefit AI companies.”
Profits will be donated to the musicians’ charity Help Musicians.
“The government’s proposal would hand the life’s work of the country’s musicians to AI companies, for free, letting those companies exploit musicians’ work to outcompete them,” Newton-Rex said.
“It is a plan that would not only be disastrous for musicians, but that is totally unnecessary,” he said. “The UK can be leaders in AI without throwing our world-leading creative industries under the bus.”
Britain’s centre-left Labour Party government says it wants to make the UK a world leader in AI.
In December, it announced a consultation into how copyright law can “enable creators and right holders to exercise control over, and seek remuneration for, the use of their works for AI training” while also ensuring “AI developers have easy access to a broad range of high-quality creative content”. The consultation closes on Tuesday.
Publishers, artists’ organisations and media companies, including Associated Press, have banded together as the Creative Rights in AI Coalition to oppose weakening copyright protections.
Several UK newspapers ran wraparounds over their front pages on Tuesday, criticising the government consultation and saying: “Let’s protect the creative industries – it’s only fair.”
The British government said in a statement that it was “consulting on a new approach that protects the interests of both AI developers and right holders and delivers a solution which allows both to thrive”. It added that “no decisions have been taken”.