*not_secure_link*www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=272173

Its all because those 60s feminists! ! !

See. . . it even explains why there are so many mama's boy trolls babbling their incoherent sputterings. . . No desire to grow the fuck up and allow their nuts to drop.

 

Actually a big factor is the female hormones in chicken and beef

 

Thanks for the chuckle FNG...I'll go back to the kitchen now....:excited:

 

It would seem to me that mamas boys become that way by having mothers that are too overprotective, are always cleaning up their messes, and such?

I've heard of these guys, who are in their 20s and maybe don't even live with their parents but yet get their moms to do their laundry or walk them through the most mundane tasks.

Let's be real, its probably best for society if those guys genetics don't make it into the next generation, anyways. Natural selection at work!

 

that's right, don't make me spank you

 

LOL! Bitch get in the kitchen and make me some pie!

 

I believe you have a valid point. Men are not what they used to be. They have been feminized. I don't think we had much of a choice. Women wanted it that way. If we had refused to give in to their demands, we would have been cut off. That is the power of the pussy my good men. Our society frowns on alpha males. I often find myself watching old movies with strong male characters. Men like John Wayne, Orson Welles and Clark Gable. They were assertive, confident and fearless. They always got the girl. My father was like that too. He was in the army. He never put up with crap from anyone. Men like that are scarce these days. The men of today are much softer. They are in touch with their feelings. They wear flip flops and knit caps that look like animal heads. Some men even visit the spa. Are these the unintended consequences of the feminist movement? It's truly a sad state of affairs.

 

Is there something wrong with the article?

 

not just feminists, weakened men too!

While I might sneer, or make a joke about `metrosexuals' they don't really bother me, as long as there are enough women that would rather give a pass on these men that seem all too easily accept `Amazonian Feminist Masterhood', and check me out instead

I like women's Libbers, not the extreme or third wave feminists. When the extreme becomes the mean(zealots silence dissent among the moderates and become the new leaders), we are all in trouble, boys and girls.
This is my view of what has been usurped.
I don't find sex readily available (as the article suggests, and some points are valid)as a single man. And yes many women worry about giving up too much of themselves when they become `a couple'.

Feminisation of men? Yes, when men cannot raise a voice of dissent to any woman's personal politics (her feminist mindset or commonly accepted popular views) The hue and cry of `anti woman' is raised, not that this stops me.
Men like John Grey truly helped to push out any masculinity in us, his stereotyping of men was more like my dad's generation, not mine.
Blame Alan Alda too, for ushering in the age of the `sensitive man' or "evolved" man.

I put myself somewhere between Clark Gable and hmmmm, well Alda will do.
I do agree that there is alienation between the sexes, and feminist groups have a lot to answer for in the setting up and perpetuation of this truly poisoned environment.

I see many chicks waiting for `the One' , I am not close to perfect, so like many others, we wait, and for the most part suffer in silence.
We can't speak up and show we are hurt, its a damned if you do, and damned if you don't kind of thing. That is showing our feelings, as we certainly don't want pity from a woman, this is like a spiritual meat grinder.
Live and let live. Its like I first posted, my vehemence relates to my personal views and situation(dating). I don't wish any ill on the metros, just as long as they don't see themselves as superior to me. I know who molded them.

I grow weary, time for cold meds soon, until later
W

 

It gets much worse guys. The ladies don't want us around anymore. They don't need us either. Don't believe me? Check this out. *not_secure_link*www.dailymail.co.u...ugh--make-decisions--theyre-ALWAYS-wrong.html

 

"Metrosexual" = View attachment

 

that;s some article Gent, I remember reading this chromosome research a few years ago. I believe at that time the rate of success was about six percent.

The things we wont miss":rolleyes: here's a turdlet!

Amazing, isn't it, how men are never in the wrong? While women criticise themselves when the meat is underdone or they left the key in the door, men can always find someone or something else to blame.

hey Joe! yep, I have heard that, for me its the defn. of `not necessarily gay, but having the stylings of'



that we always have to be right? I happen to be right, most of the time, so many chicks cant seem to stand a man that has confidence in his convictions, they confuse it for arrogance.
Same thing 25 years ago.
As for finding someone else to blame? I let the chips fall where they may(while taking responsibility for my own actions)!

What's next?

2 THEY ALWAYS OFFER ADVICE WHEN YOU JUST WANT THEM TO LISTEN
Men utterly fail to understand that women like a little moan occasionally. We are not necessarily looking for a practical solution to every little problem, we just want to unload how cross we are, how annoying life is etc etc. But men want to find an answer to our problem so that they can get back to the crossword/EastEnders/Sky Sports as soon as possible.

No, I thoroughly understand chicks need to moan maybe I grow tired of it, and feel sorry for what she is going through.
yes we have feelings for others besides ourselves!

So they can say: that's nice, i will give that some consideration, and use or reject my idea, no worries, I have thousands more.
I let girls unload, but aren't we supposed to help each other. Do I need permission to voice a possible solution?
I think not. I don't like to wallow, few men do, imagine that us trying to listen, AND offer possible solution.

I do not have to rush off to do these things! And chicks have a caniption fit when WE generalize.

Taking apart articles like this was a passtime for many years for me. Excoriation of bullshit, lies and half truths.
Many men might even feel resigned to be like this stereotype, if this is a commonly held view amongst the majority of women.
Why should I even bother to change, or reveal that I am not `that guy'?
I might tend to agree with them.

there are more turd-lets, but that's all the strength I have at the moment to go through any more mire.

 

I didn't notice this ocurring. Most women of my generation still get paid less than men. This doesn't seem to apply to baby boomers at all. Perhaps generation X and beyond?

 

:excited::excited: Yes dear, on my way......

Don't mind me, on my knees down here, cleaning up the spill from the cherry pie bubbling over.....:laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing:

 

You would also have to blame the school system for making the boys on the limp side. They stopped them from doing guy things and to express how they feel and even cry on cue.

I cannot imagine women wanting these type of guys. They want strong types.:-E:-E:-E

 

:lol:

What a load of pop-culture, socio-babbling nonsense! The claims made in the article you linked are empty, nonsensical, unsupportable tripe! Those who buy into that "feminism is the source of our ills" crap are grasping at impotent straws (much like their maturbation rituals) :lol: The wistful nostalgia heaped upon the portrayal of fictional characters played by John Wayne, Clark Gable, et al completely ignore their very real foibles as actual human beings. Those were scripted fantasy men, fellas - they never existed in real life - are you going to bemoan the loss of Superman next? :lol:

Thanks for the laugh, you insecure man-boys, you!

 

Ever seen Mad Men?

Sometimes I think Don Draper is the epitome of what the 'strong silent' type is really like - foibles and all.

How many women would realistically want to live with him?

 

here is a case study, you can go back as shortly as 100 years ago, and see the left side in living color. . . .

then we crash into the 'today' side, like the limp wristed throw of a wet tissue onto a brick wall.

it's not just America. . .

 

@old tool, my thoughts too, but i saw one truth in this thread. i think men tend to always want to solve a problem and women aren't always looking for a solution rather they just want to talk. oh and it doesn't mean that we don't want men around. honestly, life without cocks? no fucking way!

 

hunter vs gatherer evolution. . .

look at a trip to the mall. funny but true in a lot of ways.

men go out and straight back because the idiots who went out and wandered around got lost on the way back to the clan with that piece of heavy dead animal meat over their back and didn't pass on their genes.